The Macedon Ranges is growing and will continue to be a desirable location to live and work. Council must achieve a balance that protects the amenity of the region and secures high-quality investment that delivers positive economic, employment and social benefits.
In the harsh, covid recovery era, states, cities and Councils will increasingly have to fight to secure these types of high-quality investments - many of which are financed by the likes of institutional superannuation funds. It is well known that financiers and fund managers will avoid Council areas known for risks and delays.
My position:
Council must improve planning processes to provide more transparency for communities, better certainty for viable investments and an expedited ‘up-front’ process to respectfully resolve potential issues. The processes must also enable communities to work with applicants to create the best possible design solutions.
Setting the agenda by defining 'what we want and expect' upfront is preferable to endless rounds of expensive debate about 'what we don't like' in an individual application. One way of defining what we want is this example of a Design Guide produced by another council.
In my experience, these sorts of processes create better outcomes and avoids ratepayers and applicants incurring huge costs in VCAT and the courts. The design-led approach also means better quality applications and means that investors are not tied up for months dealing with issues that can (and should) be resolved at the front end.
The Macedon Ranges must be regarded as a location that welcomes high-quality, environmentally sympathetic, investments that benefit the Region. It's also a place where poor quality design or inappropriate developments will be ‘knocked-out’ early, well before ratepayers’ and applicants' time and money are wasted considering them.
Planning processes must also tap into and consider the enormous knowledge and insight of nearby residents, businesses and communities.